The following is a text I copied from the website below.
This is to take the perspective of those from Female circumcision cultures and see what they believe.
It is what Medical Doctors believe about the health benefits of female circumcision, and I will post my comments in Bold Italics
Mentioning some of these benefits, Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi
says:
The secretions of the labia minora accumulate in uncircumcised
women and turn rancid, so they develop an unpleasant odour which may lead to
infections of the vagina or urethra. I have seen many cases of sickness caused
by the lack of circumcision. Lack of circumcision or poor hygeine?, nothing a good wash couldnt cure I'm sure!
Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which
may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimeters when aroused, which is very
annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse. I doubt its annoying to the husband, but really has it got anything to do with the husband, what about the woman? Does she not count here? She might enjoy a sensitive clitoris it might give her pleasure, to me it sounds paternalistic controlling and mysoginistic, but then again I'm just a humanistic westerner what would I know?
Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation
of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes
pain. PAIN? Sure you not mixing that up with PLEASURE?
Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of
inflammation. I think spasms of the clitoris are what is commonly known as an orgasm! Inflammation, I think its called AROUSAL where I come from!!!!!!
Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire. This is the real reason for female circumcision, the control of female sexuality?
Then Dr al-Ghawaabi refutes those who claim that female
circumcision leads to frigidity by noting:
Frigidity has many causes, and this claim is not based on any
sound statistics comparing circumcised women with uncircumcised women, except in
the case of Pharaonic circumcision which is where the clitoris is excised
completely. This does in fact lead to frigidity but it is contrary to the kind
of circumcision enjoined by the Prophet of mercy (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) when he said: “Do not destroy” i.e., do not uproot or excise. This
alone is evidence that speaks for itself, because medicine at that time knew
very little about this sensitive organ (the clitoris) and its nerves. I geuss these are deeply held religious beliefs and I wont comment further.
From Liwa’ al-Islam magazine, issue 8 and 10; article entitled
Khitaan al-Banaat (circumcision of girls).
The female gynaecologist Sitt al-Banaat Khaalid says in an
article entitled Khitaan al-Banaat Ru’yah Sihhiyyah (Female circumcision from a
health point of view):
For us in the Muslim world female circumcision is, above all
else, obedience to Islam, which means acting in accordance with the fitrah and
following the Sunnah which encourages it. We all know the dimensions of Islam,
and that everything in it must be good in all aspects, including health aspects.
If the benefits are not apparent now, they will become known in the future, as
has happened with regard to male circumcision – the world now knows its benefits
and it has become widespread among all nations despite the opposition of some
groups. Sound like excellent rationalisations if you want to believe that sort of thing, just a minor ommission, HUMAN RIGHTS!!.
Then she mentioned some of the health benefits of female
circumcision and said:
It takes away excessive libido from women Surely a human rights issue!
It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions
beneath the prepuce. Heard this before, nothing a good rinse with fresh water couldnt cure.
It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections Is this truly the case? If so, UTI's are easily treatable without circumcision.
It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive
system. Is this truly the case? If so, Conventional medicine can treat without circumcision.
In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and
children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it
says:
With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves
removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision,
no harmful health effects have been noted. Is this truly the case? This whole argument that female circumcision has health benefits sounds just the same as the male circumcision arguments from the USA. If you are truly offended by reading these firmly held beliefs, then you and I are similar. However, if you are offended by these arguments yet believe they are valid in the case of male circumcision, then I say you are a hypocrite, and inconsistent!
As a closing statement I'd like to say, That these arguments in favor of female circumcision might sound primitive, barbaric and simplistic, & easily countered as I have done. But to me the arguments in favor of male circumcision sound just as primitive, barbaric & simplistic I see no difference. So as those that practice & defend femcirc sound from another planet, those that practice & defend male circ sound exactly the same to me (from the planet Uranus).
As a closing statement I'd like to say, That these arguments in favor of female circumcision might sound primitive, barbaric and simplistic, & easily countered as I have done. But to me the arguments in favor of male circumcision sound just as primitive, barbaric & simplistic I see no difference. So as those that practice & defend femcirc sound from another planet, those that practice & defend male circ sound exactly the same to me (from the planet Uranus).
The biggest difference between male and female circumcision is the biased view of the observer. It's important that people understand how various cultures view male and female circumcision from within and then consider the issue from the child's perspective.
ReplyDeleteWell done.
ReplyDelete